Tag Archives: CMS

Any anesthesiologists in the house? And by “the house” I mean California.

I don’t know how many of my California anesthesiologist readers are contracted with Medi-Cal, but I am sure there are a few of you. 

I am also sure that you know how little they pay you. But, I have recently figured out a way to get them to pay you a small amount more. 

Usually, Medi-Cal will only pay for anesthesia for one service per day. It had never mattered that the anesthesia was for a different surgery at a different time on a different body part. 

But in 2015 CMS started using the X (EPSU) modifiers. Applying them to the appropriate line item has allowed me to increase my provider’s reimbursement from Medi-Cal to all line items submitted on the claim. The modifiers are as follows: 

  • XE – “Separate encounter, A service that is distinct because it occurred during a separate encounter” This modifier should only be used to describe separate encounters on the same date of service.
  • XS – “Separate Structure, A service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure”
  • XP – “Separate Practitioner, A service that is distinct because it was performed by a different practitioner”
  • XU – “Unusual Non-Overlapping Service, The use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service”

Use the modifier on the line that pays less, just in case the automatic processing system decides it hates your particular claim. Also, since Medi-Cal does not accept more than one modifier per line, remember to use your 99 and indicate the modifiers in box 19. 

Call or email with any questions. 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Anesthesia, Medi-Cal, Medical Billing, Modifiers

When Medicare says 365 days, they mean 365 days.

Gentle readers,

It is flu shot season. And do-the-physicals-on-your-Medicare patients-before-they-go-somewhere-else-and-another-office-bills-the-physical season. And I am seeing a lot of the same question from both my billing service providers, and from you, my gentle readers.

Specifically, you billed/coded the flu shots and physicals the way I taught you and they are still getting denied! What gives?

And here is your unfortunate answer.

Medicare will pay a flu shot once every 365 days. They will pay a physical once every 365 days. They will pay a pap once every 730 days for a woman at normal risk and once every 365 days for a woman at high risk. They will pay the pneumo vaccine once every 365 days.

That means that if a patient came in on Feb 17th 2016 to get their flu shot last year and then came in this year on Jan 25th and got another flu shot, you will not get paid. Even if you bill with ICD10 Z23. Even if you bill with the Q-code for the vaccine. Medicare does not care that it is a different flu season. They do not care that your patient will be visiting their newborn grandson in a couple weeks and they need to be up to date on their immunizations. They do not care that your patient is going for a month long cruise in the caribbean and this is the last date they have available until they get back and they would prefer to get it done before they are rubbing elbows with a bunch of strangers who may have the flu.

Medicare does not care.

And they really mean 365 days. Not 364. So, when a patient needs a preventive service, please try and train your doctors and your office staff to check the date the patient received their last preventive service. The Medicare site also has a tab under the eligibility lookup section to check and see when the patient is next eligible for a preventive service. Here is a screenshot of the page and what it looks like:

medicare-prev-screen-shot-1

As you can see, the date the patient is going to be eligible for any specific service is indicated on the right. Flu and Prevnar are not included in this list, so you will need to rely on your records to track those. 

Below is the link to a good website for more information on the Medicare policies for preventive services. 

https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prevention/PrevntionGenInfo/medicare-preventive-services/MPS-QuickReferenceChart-1.html

Keep emailing your questions and I’ll keep giving you answers. 

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Flu Shot, Immunizations, Medical Billing, Medicare, Preventative services, Vaccinations

Have you heard about MACRA?

MACRA is the law that congress passed regarding Medicare in 2015. I found out about the new legislation a couple weeks ago. And, I have to tell you guys, I am not excited. 

There are going to be a LOT of changes coming for providers once the law goes into effect in 2019 and small practices will be bearing a considerable burden. 

But you all know that I would not be posting scare tactic articles here about something that won’t happen for over two years. So, the statistics that determine whether your providers (or you, if you are a provider) are going to get penalized up to 9% are going to be drawn from self reported data from 2017.

That means that in order not to be penalized in 2019, you and your providers need to make changes as of the 1st of the year. In two months.

New Generation and our sister company, J&J Billing, Inc. are putting on four free one hour trainings. Normally we charge for our webinars, but it is so important that providers know about MACRA and the changes that are coming, that we are waiving the fee. So, fill this form out, and fax it back to me and I will make sure that the online classes we schedule will accommodate everyone .

MACRA Training Availability Form

Fax (909) 367-2922

I will post the final schedule on the blog once we have all the feedback. You will need to email me to sign up for the class. I am working on a fancy-pants sign up sheet for my classes, but it is still quite a work in progress. I am a very good biller and a very bad coder. 

Seriously people, print the form, send it back. This is free. You NEED this information. Tell your friends. 

 

2 Comments

Filed under CMS, Doctor's Office, MACRA, Medical Billing, Medicare, Online classes

Medicare Unlikely Edits – or – The Rules Private Insurances Quote to Deny Your Claims

I recently billed an extended ophthalmoscopy to Blue Cross. What does this have to do with the Medicare Unlikely Edits you ask? Not much, just an intro. If you want to get right into it, skip down to the second paragraph. OK, back to the story. As those of you who bill for an ophthalmologist know, we used two line items of the 92225 with the RT/LT modifiers. Blue Cross paid the 92225 RT but denied my charge for the 92225 LT stating that according to the Medicare Unlikely Edits, only one unit of that code was allowed per day.

OK. Two things.

  1. Why is it ALWAYS Blue Cross? Seriously, Aetna doesn’t give me these kinds of problems.
  2. I am 100% sure that the Medicare Unlikely Edits realize that people have TWO eyes and TWO units of that code are allowed per day. Now I need to look up the table, verify that information, and deconstruct the CMS terminology to write my appeal letter.

The Medicare Unlikely Edits (MUE) are a table of guidelines that CMS puts out to indicate how many units of any given service are allowed for a single date of service. Here is a link to the MUE page on the CMS site. And, to make your life much easier, here is the MUE Table. The table has the CPT/HCPCS code in the first column, the Practicioner Services MUE Values in the second column, the MUE adjudication indicator in the third column, and the “MUE Rationale” in the fourth column. There is a fair amount of terminology that CMS made up specifically for these guidelines, and there is a PDF file 43 pages long that explains what that terminology means. But I am going to give you the cliff notes version, directly from the CMS manual.

Practicioner Services MUE Values = Maximum number of units allowable for a single beneficiary on a single date of service.

MUE adjudication indicator = Claim line or date of service edit. 1 = claim line edit, 2 & 3 = DOS edit.

  • A claim line edit means that appropriate modifiers ( e.g. 59, 76, 77, 91, anatomic) can be used to report the same code on separate lines of the claim. Example: A patient is in the emergency room with an asthma attack and he gets a breathing treatment. You use 94644 for the first hour, and up to two units of 94645 for the next two hours and the patient is no longer wheezing. However, before being discharged, he starts having another attack. You bill an additional line item of 94645 with the 76 or 77 modifiers with up to two additional units.
  • Indicator 2 means that there is no situation ever in which more than the indicated number of units would ever be payable. For example, in my situation, the code 92225 has an indicator of two. That is because every person in the world has a maximum of two eyes and there is no situation in which an insurance would need to pay for more than two units for a single patient one one visit.
  • Indicator 3 means that it is “possible but medically highly unlikely that higher values would represent correctly reported medically necessary services.” So, you do have some room to appeal with these codes if you can prove the services were medically necessary.

MUE Rationale = The criteria CMS used to determine the number of units allowed for each service. **Warning* Giant list of terminology ahead**

  • Anatomic considerations – A limit on the number of units based on anatomic structures. Ex: CPT 24357 – Tenotomy of the elbow, This code has a max of two units allowable, because each person has a max of two elbows.
  • Code descriptor/CPT Instruction – A limit on the number of units based on coding instructions directly from the CPT manual. Ex: CPT 73565. The CPT description says “Radiologic examination, knee; both knees, standing, anteroposterior” and the total number of units allowed is one. The one code already includes both knees for a single unit, so no additional units are payable. Unless the test had to be re-done for some medically necessary reason. Which you would then have to prove.
  • CMS Policy – A limit on the number of units based on established CMS guidelines. Those policies and guidelines can be found on the Medicare Coverage Database
  • Nature of an analyte – A limit on the number of units based on one of the following three factors:
    1. The nature of the specimen may limit the units of service – Ex: a test requiring a 24-hour urine specimen
    2. The nature of the test may limit the units of service – Ex: a test that requires 24 hours to perform.
    3. The physiology, pathophysiology, or clinical application of the analyte is such that a maximum unit of service
      for a single date of service can be determined. Ex: the MUE for RBC folic acid level is one since the test would only be necessary once on a single date of service.
  • Nature of service/procedure – A limit on the units of service, determined in general by the amount of time required to perform a service. Ex: an overnight sleep study
  • Nature of equipment – A limit on the units of service, determined in general by the number of items of equipment that would be utliized. Ex: cochlear implants

So, when I look up the code 92225 here is what I see:

CPT     MUE Values     MUE Adjudication Indicator    MUE Rationale

92225                   2                   2 Date of Service Edit: Policy         CMS Policy

This means that for CPT code 92225 a provider can bill two units of the service, and that is per CMS policy. So, now I can write an appeal to Blue Cross, with a copy of that line of the table, and a letter stating “As you can see, per CMS policy, two units of 92225 are reasonable and customary. Since you are adhering to the Medicare Unlikely Edits, please reprocess and pay line item 92225 LT.”

I hope you can use this as an additional weapon in our never ending war against the insurance companies. As always, if you need any additional help, want to set up a training for your office, or are so touched by my helpfulness and eloquence that you would like to thank me personally (j/k) please call (909) 374-5439 or email newgenerationbilling@gmail.com.

Leave a comment

Filed under Health Care, Medical Billing, Medicare